Our Virtual Eye device can help you increase practice efficiency with:

  • Test modalities, reporting accuracy, and repeatability comparable to standard automated perimetry (SAP) tests1,2
  • Audio instructions that replace the need for monitoring
  • Portable, comfortable testing in any location

256-bit Encryption

Patient records are secured for HIPAA &BAA compliance.

Cloud-based

Conduct and review tests anywhere, on any device, with a Wi-Fi connection.

Recognizable Reporting

Examination records can be printed or downloaded and saved to your EMR system.

Easily Sanitized

Synthetic leather facial cushion can be quickly disinfected between patients. 

Developed and validated by:

In clinical trials, our Virtual Eye device:

  • Showed a mean sensitivity comparable to SAP (p<0.0001) for accurate assessment of the visual field1
  • Experienced 26% shorter test times on average than traditional SAP3
  • Exhibited reliable agreement with SAP in eyelid function for ptosis evaluation4

Normative patient database collected from over 450 Bascom Palmer patients

Reports that Mirror the Gold Standard

Visual Field Tests

  • Test Patterns:
    30-2, 24-2, 10-2, 5-2
    Superior 64 & 36 (Ptosis)
    Esterman
  • Thresholding Strategy:
    Full Threshold, Standard, Fast, Suprathreshold, Screening
  • Stimulus Size: III, V (I-VI)

Visual Field Reports

  • Progression Analysis
  • Raw Threshold Values
  • Glaucoma Hemifield Test, Mean Deviation, Pattern Standard Deviation, Visual Field Index
  • Reliability Indices (False Positives, False Negatives & Fixation Loss)
NormalVV
Superior-64 Report
Screening-Report
Previous image
Next image

How it works

  • Enter Patient Data

    Our intuitive software allows you to set up a visual field test for a new patient in as little as two minutes or less.

  • Administer the Test

    Once the test starts, audio instructions will guide the patient through the exam, relieving your staff from monitoring the test.

  • Download Results

    When the test is complete, you can print or download the visual field report and save it to your EMR system.

Contact us

  1. Munshi H, Da Silva K, Savatovsky E, Bitrian E, Grajewski AL. Preliminary Retrospective Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Visual Field Standard Testing Algorithm, as Compared to Standard Automated Perimetry. Ophthalmology. – Submitted.
  2. Patel A, Lee W, Munshi H, Chang TCP, Grajewski A, Tse D, Tse B. Comparison of Virtual Reality Device vs. Standard Automated Perimetry in the Assessment of Superior Visual Field Prior to Functional Upper Eyelid Surgery. ARVO Annual Meeting, Denver, CO. May 1st – 4th, 2022.
  3. McLaughlin D, Munshi H, Grossman A, Grajewski AL. Value-Cost Analysis and Comparison: Standard Automated Perimetry vs. Head-Mounted Perimetry. 32nd AGS Annual Meeting, Nashville, TN. March 3-6, 2022.
  4. Patel A, Lee W, Munshi H, Chang TCP, Grajewski A, Tse D, Tse B. Comparison of Virtual Reality Device vs. Standard Automated Perimetry in the Assessment of Superior Visual Field Prior to Functional Upper Eyelid Surgery. ARVO Annual Meeting, Denver, CO. May 1st – 4th, 2022.